![]() It's a complete steaming memory gobbling nightmare frequently bringing my 16Gb M1Pro to a stuttering halt occasionally.ĥ. I'm starting to come to the conclusion that I am a photographer not a photo editor and would rather do minor adjustments to the images rather than attempt to dig in the sewage I've taken and turn it to gold somehow.Ħ. It's an eternal bill to be paid at £10 a month. I'm trying to make an objective analysis of which direction to turn. Any insights and opinions would be appreciated. To clarify I am not looking at any other options at the moment at all. My entire library is ~70Gb in Photos at the moment. ![]() I have been using LR since version 1 (2008). I have several terabytes worth of photos in my catalog.ġ. How many devices do you want to use it on? You can keep a catalog on an external drive (although not a NAS) which might be helpful. I do know at least one person keeps her catalog on Dropbox, although I strongly recommend against that. But I think she creates a new catalog monthly or so and then exports finished jpegs elsewhere. I think that risks catalog corruption, but she insists it works for her.Ģ. What kind of sharing functions do you want?ģ. half the power of LR is in the DAM functions, keywording and organization. If you aren't using that half, then LR is perhaps not a great fit for you.Ħ. ![]() Yes, it's $10/month, but I find the upgrades are worth it, and I personally bought every single yearly upgrade when it was a single license, and now I also get PS for the same yearly price, and I use PS in my photo workflow and for other projects, so for me it's less cost overall. A few years ago I began the journey of trying to find a new editing program to replace Aperture - Capture One Pro was overkill for my needs and skill level and ditto for some other programs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |